Gender identity and reproductive problems in modern society
Abstract
The article discusses trends in changes in gender identity in modern society and the connection of these changes with the reproductive health of women and men. The concept of a “cultural model of gender identity” is proposed, within the framework of which the qualities and norms of behavior attributed to women and men ensure the success of reproduction in the conditions of a given specific society. Based on the analysis of male and female roles in different cultural and historical conditions, it is assumed that in the history of society, cultural gender models corresponded to the psychophysiological characteristics of women and men, which are biologically determined by the sexual differentiation of the brain. The existence of contradictions between the sexual differentiation of the brain and the requirements for women and men in modern society is described. This contradiction consists in the general masculinization of the education system and professional requirements, which do not correspond to the cyclical nature of the female reproductive system, on the one hand, and on the other hand, in the requirements for the manifestation of feminine qualities from men in the social sphere and in caring for children. The impact of these contradictions on the reproductive health of women and men and possible ways of change in society are discussed in order to create conditions for the full implementation of all spheres of life and preservation of the reproductive health of women and men
About the Author
G. G. Filippova
ЧУ ДПО «Институт перинатальной и репродуктивной психологии»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Aleksander F. Psihosomaticheskaya medicina. Principy i primenenie. – M.: Institut Obshchegumanitarnyh Issledovanij, 2004. – 336s.
2. Anohin P. K. Uzlovye voprosy teorii funkcional'nyh sistem. – M.: Nauka, 1980. – 197s.
3. Arshavskij I.A. Rol' gestacionnoj dominanty v kachestve faktora, opredelyayushchego normal'noe ili uklonyayushcheesya ot normy razvitie zarodysha // Aktual'nye voprosy akusherstva i ginekologii. – M.: Nauka, 1957. – S. 320-333
4. Bern SH. Gendernaya psihologiya. – SPb.: Prajm-EVROZNAK, 2007. – 320s.
5. Burchakova M.N., Burchakov D.I."Mursiki" i drugie "gosti": kak zhenshchiny nazyvayut menstruacii.; zhurnal: ZHenskoe zdorov'e i reprodukciya. №1(32), 2019. [Elektronnyj resurs] // URL:https://journalgynecology.ru/statyi/mursiki-i-drugie-gosti-kak-zhenshhiny-nazyvajut-menstruacii/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.01.2024).
6. Vasil'eva V. V. Psihofiziologiya zhenskoj reprodukcii. – Batajsk: Batajskoe knizhnoe izd-vo, 2005. – 208 s.
7. Gormonal'naya regulyaciya razmnozheniya u mlekopitayushchih / K. Ostin, R. SHort. Per. s angl. – M.: Mir, 1987. – 305s.
8. Dali K. Psihologiya menstruacii. Per. s angl: i nem. – M.: Russkoe psihoanaliticheskoe obshchestvo; Izhevsk: ID «ERGO», 2006. – 194s.
9. Dovzhenko A., Dudina V., Karpova N., Kolbasyuk U., YAcenko A. Analiz teoreticheskih i metodologicheskih aspektov issledovaniya gendernoĭ identichnosti. // Norwegian Journal of development of the International Science, 2020. – No 51. – S. 64-69
10. Il'in E.P. Differencial'naya psihofiziologiya muzhchiny i zhenshchiny. – SPb.: Piter, 2002 – 544s.
11. Korsak V.S., Smirnova A.A., SHurygina O.V. VRT v Rossii. Otchet za 2021 god. // Registr VRT. Otchet za 2021 god. – Rossijskaya Associaciya Reprodukcii CHeloveka. – Spb., 2023. – s.29-32
12. Kochepasova A.YU. Reproduktivnye strategii i formy sem'i: k voprosu metodologii sociologicheskih issledovanij. // Medicina. Sociologiya. Filosofiya. Prikladnye issledovaniya, 2020. – №4. – s. 104-107
13. Kuznecova I. V., Filippova G. G., Burchakova M. N., Burchakov D. I., Hadzhieva N. H. Psihogennye stress-zavisimye narusheniya menstrual'nogo cikla: rol' negormonal'noĭ korrekcii / Sovremennaya ginekologiya. – T. 2. – Medicinskiĭ alfavit, 2017. – №10 (307). –– S. 54-61
14. Mid M. Kul'tura i mir detstva. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. – M.: Nauka, 1988. – 425s.
15. Mishukova A.S. Reproduktivnoe povedenie kak kul'turologicheskij termin // Diskussiya, 2012. – № 8(26). – S. 26–29
16. Orlov V.I., A.V. CHernositov, K.YU. Sagamonova, T.L. Botasheva. Funkcional'naya mezhpolusharnaya asimmetriya. Hrestomatiya. / Pod red. N.N. Bogolepova, V.F. Fokina. – M.: Nauchnyj mir, 2004. – 787s.
17. Psihodiagnosticheskie metodiki izucheniya gendernyh osobennostej lichnosti: metod. rekomendacii dlya studentov, obuch. po special'nostyam 1-86 01 01 «Social'naya rabota (po napravleniyam)» i 1-23 01 04 «Psihologiya» / sost. E. D. Bespanskaya-Pavlenko. – Minsk: BGU, 2013. – 87s.
18. Pustarnakova A.A. Sociokul'turnye determinanty reproduktivnogo povedeniya etnicheskih grupp // Aspirantskiĭ vestnik Povolzh'ya, 2021. – No 3–4. – S. 78–82.
19. Reznikov A.G., Pishchak V.P., Nosenko N.D., Tkachuk S.S., Myslickij V.F. Prenatal'nyj stress i nejroendokrinnaya patologiya. – CHernovcy: Medakademiya, 2004. – 351s.
20. Sebeleva YU.G. Gendernaya identichnost' u zhenshchin, stradayushchih besplodiem (v programme ekstrakorporal'nogo oplodotvoreniya). Avtor. Diss. Kand. Psihol. nauk. – M., 2014. – 27s.
21. Stepanova L. G. Vvedenie v gendernuyu psihologiyu // Semejnaya psihologiya i semejnaya terapiya, 2010. – № 3. – S. 3–128
22. Tatarchuk T.F. Stress i reproduktivnaya funkciya zhenshchiny. //Mezhdunarodnyj endokrinologicheskij zhurnal, 2006. – №3 (5.) [Elektronnyj resurs] // URL: http://endocrinology.mif-ua.com/archive/article/2107. (data obrashcheniya: 22.08.2020).
23. Uhtomskij A. A. Dominanta. – M.; L.: Nauka, 1966. – 273 s.
24. Filippova G.G. Psihologiya reproduktivnoj sfery cheloveka: metodologiya, teoriya, praktika. [Elektronnyj resurs] // Medicinskaya psihologiya v Rossii: elektron. nauch. zhurn. 2011. N 6. URL: http://medpsy.ru. (data obrashcheniya: 18.05.2022).
25. Filippova G.G. Psihologiya materinstva: ucheb. posobie dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata. – 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. – M.: Izdatel'stvo YUrajt, 2018. – 212s.
26. Filippova G.G. Stress i narushenie reproduktivnoj funkcii // Antologiya Rossijskoj psihoterapii i psihologii. Materialy itogovogo mezhdunarodnogo kongressa «Psihologiya i psihoterapiya kazhdogo dnya i vsej zhizni». Moskva, 15-18 noyabrya 2018 g. – 225 s. – S. 69-72
27. Filippova G.G. Osobennosti vozrastnoj identichnosti u pacientok pozdnego reproduktivnogo vozrasta. // Reproduktivnye tekhnologii segodnya i zavtra. Materialy XXXIII ezhegodnoĭ Mezhdunarodnoĭ konferencii Rossiĭskoĭ Associacii Reprodukcii CHeloveka (6—9 sentyabrya 2023 g., Nizhniĭ Novgorod) — 157 s. – s.128-130
28. Erikson E. Detstvo i obshchestvo. Spb.: Lenato AST, 1996. – 592s.
29. Levine H. et al. Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Human Reproduction Update, Volume 23, Issue 6, November-December 2017, Pages 646–659. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmx022. (accessed: January 31, 2024).
30. Norton E. Low testosterone levels may make men better fathers. Available at: https://www.science.org/content/article/fatherhood-decreases-testosterone. (accessed: January 20, 2024).
31.
Review
For citations:
Filippova G.G. Gender identity and reproductive problems in modern society. Medical Psychology in Russia. 2024;16(1):45-59. (In Russ.)
Views:
568
Email this article 